Skip to content

Corridor

The corridor is a family of options, not a defined line. The map below overlays the layers that constrain any route — solar resource, transmission, native title, water, existing infrastructure. Selection between routes and nodes depends on inputs the site does not yet have: Traditional Owner engagement outcomes, anchor customer preferences, and site-specific work.

The Map

Five candidate alignments across Australia. Central desert and Inland West run from Kalgoorlie through Alice Springs and Tennant Creek to Mount Isa; the Northern arc runs Newman to Karratha across to Tennant Creek and on to Townsville; the Southern arc runs along the Nullarbor through Port Augusta and Broken Hill to Longreach; Adelaide–Darwin runs north-south along the Stuart Highway. Existing transmission is dense on both coasts and thin between them.
Five candidate alignments and their anchor nodes, against existing transmission. Schematic centrelines between named nodes — not surveyed routes. Open the full map to toggle them one at a time.

The map overlays: solar resource, existing transmission, substations, power stations, data centres (PeeringDB extract), roads, native title determinations and applications, ABARES Indigenous Estate, water frequency, submarine cable landings.

The corridor’s case is visible as the negative space: the empty inland belt where solar resource is highest, existing load is lowest, transmission is thinnest, and no data centres sit. That is what the corridor would fill.

This map covers the corridor option space. OpenGridWorks maps the same infrastructure classes worldwide — power plants, transmission, substations, data centres and submarine cables — from OpenStreetMap, ENTSO-E, Global Energy Monitor and other public sources. Coverage is strongest in the United States.

View the Global Map(opens in a new tab)

Corridor Options

Five candidate alignments are worth serious analysis. Each shadows different existing infrastructure and creates different trade-offs.

These five alignments span different anchor logics rather than being variants of one shape. Southern arc and Adelaide–Darwin share Port Augusta as an anchor node — the site of an existing coal-to-solar institutional transition.

OptionRouteLengthExisting Corridor ShadowedTrade-Offs
Central desertKalgoorlie → Warburton → Yulara → Alice Springs → Tennant Creek → Mt Isa → Longreach~3,400 kmGreat Central Rd, Stuart Hwy, Barkly Hwy, Mt Isa railHighest coverage of high-GHI belt; longest; most jurisdictions crossed
Inland WestKalgoorlie → Leonora → Warburton → Alice Springs → Tennant Creek → Mt Isa~2,600 kmGoldfields Hwy, Great Central Rd, Stuart Hwy, Barkly HwyShorter; fewer nodes; skips QLD central west
Northern arcNewman → Karratha → Tennant Creek → Mt Isa → Townsville~2,900 kmGreat Northern Hwy, Barkly Hwy, CopperString routeFastest CopperString connection; anchored to Pilbara mineral processing; skips WA Goldfields
Southern arcKalgoorlie → Norseman → Nullarbor → Ceduna → Port Augusta → Broken Hill → Cobar → Bourke → Charleville → Longreach~3,800 kmEyre Hwy, Trans-Australian Railway, Barrier Hwy, Kidman Way, Mitchell Hwy, Landsborough HwyOnly alignment touching three grids — SWIS at Kalgoorlie, the SA NEM at Port Augusta, the NSW NEM at Broken Hill; longest
Adelaide–DarwinAdelaide → Port Augusta → Coober Pedy → Alice Springs → Tennant Creek → Katherine → Darwin~3,000 kmStuart Hwy end to end, Adelaide–Darwin railwayNorth-south rather than west-east; Darwin as an Asian-market port; DKIS integration; does not serve the eastern seaboard

None of these is presented as the corridor. Each is a coherent option under different anchor assumptions.

Corridor Route Trade-Offs

Any alignment balances five trade-offs.

CriterionWhat It FavoursImplication
Solar resourceInland WA–NT–NW QLD belt above 2,200 kWh/m²Desert and tableland routes, not coastal
TerrainLower-relief plains and tablelandsAvoids ranges; supports linear infrastructure
Flood exposureNorthern arc over Boulia/Channel CountrySouthern alignments must handle Georgina/Diamantina floodplains
Existing roads and railEstablished freight corridorsConstruction access and operating logistics
Land tenure and CountryDetermined native title and pastoral leaseRequires consent before any alignment claim
Anchor logicWest-east (grid-linked, mineral processing, central belt) versus north-south (Asian market, DKIS integration)Determines which markets and which grids the corridor can reach at all, before any question of route efficiency

Anchor Nodes Across the Option Space

Regardless of route, six potential anchor nodes emerge. Each plays a different functional role.

  • Kalgoorlie / Leonora (WA) — industrial logic, mining services workforce, SWIS interconnection at Kalgoorlie
  • Newman / Karratha (WA) — northern arc anchor; Pilbara mineral processing tie-in
  • Alice Springs (NT) — central services and workforce base
  • Tennant Creek (NT) — strongest solar resource; requires most infrastructure development
  • Mount Isa (QLD) — heavy industry, CopperString grid connection, established workforce
  • Longreach (QLD) — regional services, eastern logistics interface

The Southern arc and Adelaide–Darwin alignments introduce further nodes:

  • Southern arc — Norseman, Nullarbor Roadhouse, Ceduna, Port Augusta, Broken Hill, Cobar, Bourke, Cunnamulla, Charleville
  • Adelaide–Darwin — Adelaide, Port Augusta, Coober Pedy, Marla, Kulgera, Elliott, Daly Waters, Mataranka, Katherine, Adelaide River, Darwin

What This Page Is and Is Not

This is:

  • A structured presentation of the option space
  • A first-pass layer map to think against
  • A framework for principles-based selection

This is not:

  • A surveyed route
  • A claim on any land
  • A consent record from Traditional Owners (see Country)
  • Cleared under EPBC or state environmental frameworks